09
Oct

I was listening while a group of executives spoke about how to make their organization more agile. What was interesting, was that most of their comments referred to the speed they needed to move, rather than to their agility. I think it’s important to understand the difference between speed and agility because they serve different purposes and can even be in tension. You need to know whether you’re emphasizing speed or agility and act accordingly.

Google defines agility in business as “distinct qualities that allow organizations to respond rapidly to changes in the internal and external environment without losing momentum or vision.” To be agile, your organization must be able to change direction quickly.

What I heard the executives talking about was better described as sense of urgency. They needed their leaders to be highly engaged, to be driven, and to get things moving faster. To be fast, your organization must be able to go from decision to implementation with few speed bumps.

Speed and agility aren’t the same thing. Most large bureaucracies do better at speed than agility because their cascading systems are built to lock in key decisions at the top and replicate the same behavior over a vast network.

There’s a McDonald’s restaurant near me that exemplifies this. They have a very small footprint for the kitchen and have invested in specialized equipment to allow them to go very fast. Their French fry baskets automatically load and their McFlurry candy machines dispense exactly the right amount of crunchy yumminess into the ice cream. This allows them to serve you extremely quickly. Structures, systems, and consistency support speed.

When fries and ice cream go out of food fashion, their investment in speed makes it very difficult for them to change direction. On the other end of the spectrum is the chef’s kitchen. There is no specialized equipment, only stoves, pans, and a pantry full of ingredients. If fries are suddenly gauche, baked potatoes are just as easy to prepare. Broad training, reconfigurable tools, and creativity support agility.

So which does your team need more of?

Give some thought to whether you want your team to emphasize speed or agility. Is it more important that they take directions and act with a sense of urgency to implement them; or is it more important that they retain flexibility to adapt to changes in the environment? Build the system to support whichever is more important.

Increasing speed

  1. Processes: If you want to go fast, ensure your decision making and governance processes support speed. Clear ownership of decisions is a must; if collaboration becomes consensus, you’re stuck. Codify core processes, build industrial strength systems (with supporting technology) and train the heck out of people so they can execute the same thing flawlessly.
  2. Culture: Reinforcing speed requires clear and consistent messages about the stakes of going fast (and the consequences of going slowly). Messages should create confidence that you have the right strategy and the difference between failure and success is in how efficiently that strategy is implemented.
  3. Behaviors: Train and coach your team to master their jobs. Reward people who turn out good work without striving for perfection. To avoid the negative repercussions of speed, set clear limits of where speed becomes recklessness.

Increasing agility

  1. Processes: If you want to turn on a dime, refocus your decision making on current data and insight. Create a two-way flow of information in the organization to bring information to and from the marketplace. Articulate guiding principles rather than rules, invest in flexible systems (from office design, to manufacturing, to IT). Educate the team broadly and invest in transferable skills so team members can add value in different ways.
  2. Culture: Creating an agile culture means focusing on your fundamental skills as an organization, rather than on short-lived products or services. Messages should center around the customer and the market and link success to the team’s ability to find better ways to serve those customers and succeed in those markets.
  3. Behaviors: Train and coach your team to apply their diverse skills in new and different ways. Reward people who adapt and proactively capitalize on new opportunities. To avoid the risks of going ditch to ditch with changes, be clear about when a shift in priorities requires discussion and/or approvals.

If you need both

Of course, you can take the speed/agility trade off too far. The fastest product development company with zero agility keeps churning out new products without noticing that their entire category has gone the way of the dodo bird. The most agile software company changes tack dozens of times in response to new hardware but fails to get anything to market. To some extent, you need both speed and agility. The secret is to deliberately choose when you will bias toward speed and when you’ll choose agility.

Further Reading

You’re Not Going as Fast as You Think

How to Go Faster

Quick Steps to Improve Your Decision Making

 

4 Responses to Fast or agile: Which are you really looking for?

  1. Sourabh Malik

    Extremely well written describing the specific direction on agility and speed. We talk a lot about turning on a dime, but have little clarity on how to get there…having guiding principles vs rules empowers and energizes associates to act like entrepreneurs and respond to the dynamic customer needs.

  2. Pingback: You’re not going as fast as you think | 3coze

  3. Pingback: How to go faster | 3coze

  4. Pingback: 3 Forms of Indecisiveness | 3coze

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *